From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bazaar: "unable to obtain lock" Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:20:57 +1100 Organization: Bah Humbug Message-ID: <878wccuu2u.fsf@blah.blah> References: <87my11gmf4.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fx6sqbnt.fsf@blah.blah> <877hs4m1dh.fsf@telefonica.net> <87fx6m7r18.fsf@blah.blah> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262736426 15855 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2010 00:07:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 00:07:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 01:06:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSJQQ-0002co-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:06:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSJQP-0003o9-Ms for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSGq7-0000M7-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:21:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSGq2-0000HO-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:21:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57858 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSGq1-0000HG-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout2-16.pacific.net.au ([125.255.80.143]:52306 helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSGq1-0004Iv-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A048E1AA717 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:21:07 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from blah.blah (ppp26FC.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.38.252]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933A827407 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:21:06 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by blah.blah with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NSGpl-0001D3-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:20:57 +1100 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:05:48 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119476 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > For > example, today's "bzr up" crams 185MB(!) of data through the wire. Strewth. > So I'm not sure if we should tell anything about traffic beyond the > initial branch, whose size is more or less known and changes very > slowly. Well, at least somehow that it's much more than the size of a "diff"!