From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Commit netiquette. Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:51:04 +0100 Message-ID: <878warz7rb.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87eikjzaug.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266454307 9305 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2010 00:51:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:51:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 01:51:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhucJ-0005fu-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:51:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NhucE-0008Fn-Hx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhuc9-0008Fi-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34106 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nhuc8-0008Fa-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhuc8-0005rd-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:51:32 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhuc7-0005rO-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:51:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhuc5-0005c6-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:51:29 +0100 Original-Received: from 206.red-81-33-105.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([81.33.105.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:51:29 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 206.red-81-33-105.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:51:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.red-81-33-105.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hrwoZRGH5qiY7+iM1zrf4e6phgQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121174 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >> It would be a Good Thing (TM) to explicitly set good practices for >> commits. > > Like admin/notes/commits? It's good, although I miss there some statement about not mixing heterogeneous changes on the same commit. > But nobody reads admin/notes/. It is not the most visible place. And how many Emacs hackers watch it for changes?