From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ^D is broken in shell-mode Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:11:39 +0200 Message-ID: <878w63wbus.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sk4dn4dg.fsf@gmail.com> <87wrtpehte.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277494820 3880 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2010 19:40:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 25 21:40:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSEl7-00044G-4y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:40:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34980 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSEl6-0001Ra-Ah for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44299 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSD35-0002Hf-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7lg-0003UV-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:12:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:57326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7lf-0003Tr-5C; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:12:23 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so224957fge.12 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DzgnpAScahh/EBRybNp5R+F+XE1+WvQQq3/LLYbhfAo=; b=wp/blc54ypUfDIbItFe0Vh5HLm217QsLEzt7zTePmkmV1dKDx42mNfc2kboS99ck7S zRy2f+oprU2z/vDJcyvb0LXhxWG855mExj3LrOo1SR+/KGxe/XbZPEPUR0p9EhCEMvqL wlaNq4jBA1EeMJEJZV4jVPNy+wDrWnLIr6SkQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TPpkwrwRignnXL1CxiUNlD3llfwTOYZiupXKBydsxaNRMiCGzDvfwFNivbsfifu+KT efo+comnlQGIcq7ZDMHcqE+NhD7mS8sjvkknE/utFJDmsccThZd87HB2nuCXQsrmNXY+ SivMz1/kkZk0wZ5jIFJmXYtkwR0eW1piOtLNs= Original-Received: by 10.87.5.30 with SMTP id h30mr1030400fgi.3.1277467941283; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm17378822fks.52.2010.06.25.05.12.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:12:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wrtpehte.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> (Jose A. Ortega Ruiz's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:15:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126393 Archived-At: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > On Wed, Jun 23 2010, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec wrote: > >> "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 08 2010, Miles Bader wrote: >>> >>>> It now results in a literal ^D being seen by the subproces. >>> >>> I've also noticed that this problem affects comint-mode, and is not >>> limited to xterm: i'm encountering it in rxvt too. >> >> Could the problem with Magit being unusable with current Emacs be >> related as well? (Perhaps through `process-send-eof' used in >> `magit-run*' (?); interestingly, I experience no problems in shell or >> comint modes, though): > > Certainly, the problems i'm observing in comint-derived modes are due to > `process-send-eof' not working (and magit doesn't work for me, either). So IIUC the trunk is currently broken. Why is the change not reverted until a solution to the problem is found? =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n