From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Intervals crash Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:22:12 +0900 Message-ID: <878w2o1fa3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87aan82uar.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83bp7ouw2u.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7n3c19.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83iq1vtv3y.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrqb1q2b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83fwwztq4e.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk0x28pr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83y6aprehh.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbhd1wn4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83vd5tqxyp.fsf@gnu.org> <87eicg1wl5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285528952 4431 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2010 19:22:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:22:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 26 21:22:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozwnu-0003D8-OX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:22:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47761 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ozwnu-0008Vp-0Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54718 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ozwno-0008Vk-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozwnm-000655-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:22:23 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozwnm-00064u-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozwnl-00039j-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:22:21 +0200 Original-Received: from 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.154.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:22:21 +0200 Original-Received: from miles by 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:22:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Cancel-Lock: sha1:pQ7tkYNnMyskXQJ11XqT/RbXLWo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130935 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Quite the opposite. I'm speaking from pure experience: it worked very > well for XEmacs. I happen to have a good memory for theoretical > arguments, so I passed them on. I'm sorry that offended you. "unsigned good or evil" is such a hoary old religious issue that any unasked-for advocacy is likely to get you lumped in with the freaks, simply out of habit on the part of the listener... -Miles -- Year, n. A period of three hundred and sixty-five disappointments.