From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:52:31 +0200 Message-ID: <878w1r5t7k.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87tykgxqbb.fsf@fastmail.fm> <878w1s7zw8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871v7k7ydt.fsf_-_@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4CC00391.6050608@easy-emacs.de> <87wrpb7unc.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <15036.1287673547@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CC078A6.7060309@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287685942 30554 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2010 18:32:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Dokos , Carsten Dominik , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 21 20:32:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zw3-0003go-9Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:32:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8zhm-0002Ta-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50661 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8zJe-0007Np-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zJc-0001QV-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:52465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zJc-0001QI-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FD644B; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:52:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:52:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=/Fng4E8OcVCaUuRkOK7WJE32WCg=; b=i3Io/dXRFIZVM583iwvlj8m7gQA+v3Np7rsUCHaKBWSGew5QD0187DiROxBlfM/CFl4QAdXJdLSwAUS0imUUOYj9STNUlgcuLROetiPku61jrtsGwefUQuLis3I0sKetkYe/K4yKGVk7SLjprcYFCxVMqgHwNqyg1YEPVBpWU4E= X-Sasl-enc: 9fmn7pYE0q1ohW/hhQLIacYeSijuL7lh10PL3xvolzVa 1287683555 Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (p54AF01E6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.175.1.230]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D4B7B400AAD; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:52:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4CC078A6.7060309@online.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:30:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131948 Archived-At: Andreas R=C3=B6hler writes: Hi Andreas, > Keeping things easy, it seems preferable to have a working common > footnote first and reflect the use in mails resp. signature issue > afterwards. I don't get it. The "common" footnote.el works great with email and signatures, but doesn't recognize existing footnotes when revisiting a file. org-footnote.el doesn't (yet) handle signatures in mails and requires some macros and compatibility functions from org, but it recognizes existing footnotes. Bye, Tassilo