From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:40:56 +0100 Message-ID: <878vyhbu93.fsf@altern.org> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj2jouz7.fsf@fastmail.fm> <877he2fvw0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsqw8u3.fsf@fastmail.fm> <878vyhg5zx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59937 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfM6q-00070w-PQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:41:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfM6q-0002rr-2p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:41:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:64874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfM6p-0002rd-R4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:41:12 -0500 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so267644wwb.30 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:41:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878vyhg5zx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> (Jason Dunsmore's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:13:38 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jeff Horn , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Jason Dunsmore writes: > The new stylesheet is in place now. Great, thanks all for this effort! Jason, correct me if I'm wrong, I think you copied worg.css directly on the server. So I put it in the Worg.git repo and then publised Worg again. So changes to worg.css can happen from the repo (unless Matt and Jason think it's best to have worg.css on the server *only*.) I changed the background of code chunks to black - please revert this if you find it too agressive/unreadable. I really dislike the fake white we had as the background for black-on-white code chunks... -- Bastien