From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0 Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:02:58 +0100 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <878vwwwp8d.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> References: <4D6BBD34.6050407@mousecar.com> <4D6BD989.9010102@mousecar.com> <87r5apwxad.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299145242 1501 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2011 09:40:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:40:42 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 10:40:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv51P-0007w0-5D for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:40:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pv51O-0000Ik-Nm for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 04:40:34 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Trace: individual.net 5YZ8oKHZGJIo+isCQfH8lwfX5RPT6Xht3VA88YRDPcr0Ayd+R0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:OGE2ZTY2MTNjNTUyYjMyOTVkNjhmMTI4MWQ4ODExMTZiYTgzNzVkNw== sha1:b3J1e+YJqE2HZbyGDSss2JDwxp0= Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en X-Disabled: X-No-Archive: no User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:185583 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:79739 Archived-At: Barry Margolin writes: > In article <87r5apwxad.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>, > "Pascal J. Bourguignon" wrote: > >> Barry Margolin writes: >> >> > In article >> > , >> > rusi wrote: >> > >> >> yes it is. emacs lisp became obsolete when scheme and common lisp came >> >> out -- which is about 30 years ago. >> > >> > How is that possible, since Emacs Lisp came out AFTER Scheme and Common >> > Lisp? CLtL was published in 1984, the same year Stallman started >> > writing GNU Emacs? And Scheme is older, since CL took a number of ideas >> > from it (most notably lexical scoping). >> >> At the same time as CL. >> The CL standard was completed in 1994. 1984 only marks the beginning >> of the standardization effort. > > So? CL predates the standardization effort. 1984 marks the END of > several years of work that produced the book "Common Lisp: the Language". Well, I understand reticence of RMS to use a language that's not even standardized yet. Of course, I shall then wonder why he had to design his own non-standardized language. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.