From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6870: Make vc-root-diff work in more modes Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:58:14 -0400 Message-ID: <878vscla1l.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <19561.60443.364109.899857@rgr.rgrjr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309905563 20248 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2011 22:39:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , rogers-emacs@rgrjr.dyndns.org, 6870@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 06 00:39:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeEGw-0002RK-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:39:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeEEr-00022p-Jj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeCi0-0002ip-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeChz-00036Q-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeChy-00036L-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeChy-0005e2-4g; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6870 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6870.130989950421653 (code B ref 6870); Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2011 20:58:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeChL-0005dC-BV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:58:23 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeChJ-0005cz-CF for 6870@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014245.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p65KwFoV017838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:58:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:04:09 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:59:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48046 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> What about all buffers that have file names? A la > >> (and (buffer-file-name) >> (vc-responsible-backend default-directory)) > > That'd be fine, yes. But this might be confusing, since this check would not trigger for non-file buffers generated from those file buffers. i.e., if you have a buffer with a file name that is not handled by VC, vc-root-diff would work for that buffer but not for a diff file generated from that buffer. Whereas if a buffer with a file name *is* handled by VC, vc-root-diff would work for both that buffer and a diff file generated for that buffer.