From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: valgrind warnings [Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint] Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:08:27 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878vo5xifo.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87fwivwp37.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmvpmd2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa93wmc4.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmnrdjw.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87ty73mc0m.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <4EA19111.7060401@yandex.ru> <87vcrhfmww.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87pqhpf1qo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k47qaxvz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83bot1bovw.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5w531eo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83zkgla1mg.fsf@gnu.org> <87vcr92z6x.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83ty6t9zd0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319814549 10254 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2011 15:09:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:09:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 28 17:09:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJo3M-0002ri-4j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:09:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55401 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJo3L-0005oy-A4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJo30-00055d-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:08:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJo2z-0006Em-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJo2z-0006Dw-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJo2x-0002dD-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:08:39 +0200 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:08:39 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:08:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1ci72pu+6DT5gY+zaiZzUaBSqJo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145714 Archived-At: On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:52:12 -0400 Dan Nicolaescu wrote: DN> On Fedora 15 with valgrind-3.6.1 it is possible to run DN> valgrind ./temacs I ran this and opened and closed a GnuTLS connection many times: (open-gnutls-stream "tls" "tls-buffer" "imap.gmail.com" "imaps") I did not see any errors printed when I did this, but on exit a lot of information was printed that did not seem related (I could not analyze it all, it was too much data and I don't know what to look for other than "gnutls"). Is this enough to tell us there are no memory leaks in the "open connection" part of the code? I'll test sending and receiving data if so. Ted