From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10150: deactive->inactive, inactivate->deactivate spelling fixes Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:47:00 +0100 Message-ID: <878vmzf8wb.fsf__10498.0072625496$1322567661$gmane$org@gmail.com> References: <4ED2CA07.2090202@cs.ucla.edu> <87d3ccfqcm.fsf@gmail.com> <4ED49229.2030107@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322567661 17814 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2011 11:54:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10150@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 29 12:54:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMGP-00072n-3d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:54:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMGO-0005kc-N2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:54:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMGJ-0005kF-Cv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMGB-00049m-4f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMGA-00049c-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMI5-0002j5-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 10150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10150.132256771310421 (code B ref 10150); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2011 11:55:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMHF-0002hz-MH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:55:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMHC-0002hp-9I for 10150@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:55:07 -0500 Original-Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so3103954eab.3 for <10150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:53:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7cRtXDF3lYwxJK4OffDPbzDJ9OfHaobJiNhdGjg7Pdk=; b=K4mSKD145QiWquZi8KkLbY/jtAHStLN8euQXgRkCa3L1nmOnC1lXr/INVe82pKSYH/ HC1onK1AoPXl80MBK/Bb3NoN3wFegTKGB6ljczYyNwUAOZ1wmALKo3CWtYMvggayTM6H WL3S5d9+NR1VrleSKYVaz55fcvmbrs9tzVh0s= Original-Received: by 10.213.33.130 with SMTP id h2mr727713ebd.122.1322567585915; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:53:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (176.119.broadband10.iol.cz. [90.177.119.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm30360933eei.8.2011.11.29.03.53.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:53:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4ED49229.2030107@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:04:57 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:56:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54411 Archived-At: On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:04:57 +0100 Paul Eggert wrote: > On 11/28/11 03:17, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec wrote: >> By renaming functions and variables without any kind of deprecation >> procedure (cf. `make-obsolete' and friends), > > Sure, we can do deprecation. Is the usual procedure to do this for > all visible symbols, or only for the symbols that are documented > in the manual? You'd have to ask the maintainers for the definitive answer (emacs-devel added to the Cc: list); I think it's usually closer to the latter. IMO all commands, hooks and user variables definitely need deprecation, the rest should at least be mentioned in NEWS. --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n