From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:20:43 -0400 Organization: disorganization Message-ID: <878vc63j10.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120918192807.6a426ea58372355516a2ea50@cx4a.org> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348017657 31343 80.91.229.3 (19 Sep 2012 01:20:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:20:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 19 03:21:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8yK-0004mQ-W8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:21:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60005 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8yG-0001Hk-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8yE-0001He-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8yD-0007xV-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:20:54 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8yD-0007x2-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE8yF-0004jC-1r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:20:55 +0200 Original-Received: from ool-43501bc4.dyn.optonline.net ([67.80.27.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:20:55 +0200 Original-Received: from sds by ool-43501bc4.dyn.optonline.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:20:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ool-43501bc4.dyn.optonline.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Cancel-Lock: sha1:lVhcy/Ikls7TUspZFyTtWNbwT3s= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153388 Archived-At: > * Stefan Monnier [2012-09-18 08:44:39 -0400]: > > As mentioned in my reply there, the two aren't quite compatible > (because (lexical-let ((tab-width 4)) foo) will be a lexical binding, are you seriously saying that lexical-let ignores defvar?! -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://ffii.org http://mideasttruth.com http://memri.org http://palestinefacts.org The software said it requires Windows 3.1 or better, so I installed Linux.