From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Error while checking out the elpa branch Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:02:17 -0100 Message-ID: <878v8n9eye.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <871ufzxdm8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <838va6wuiy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356393753 19400 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2012 00:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 25 01:02:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TnHyo-0000GK-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:02:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33510 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnHyZ-0007TB-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnHyT-0007Sp-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnHyP-0002z1-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:63113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TnHyP-0002xn-3p; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id s15so9161447lag.29 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:02:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=C43HucBkKVzuj3dKOeW60mNNslXF+yD8Pnwcmvs+g0Y=; b=VTkno7zeCii38A9OTFcrnsbFdpWGWbX4P8JQPIENFpLgDpKN0GcnYqKr+Oi/7+QAGj jDmgpm83+GTXCFtOLeAbWc5F69RF5dEcdRWPyJWnyhscbAkr3mssEGK0QN17c3yXX0kp tgHW2LrHZEBmCOgEAkNkqD4ERecQr5qdi/jbBpZ2MwF7cOwnGFv2iC7pFtzN/8N6hlF6 eEuDFb071gWYLcvy0qnINddmGzz8sRx+GUhZWexsIz5XUwWgZaMok9y8wIDa4VmXzAvm ov6Z8Puv0LNZq8l3ZCAhzf6vcyE2p6IYHoFfvMZETgkGGVeIz8laPLqqupQ35+MwzZzK QVcw== X-Received: by 10.112.98.134 with SMTP id ei6mr8793414lbb.62.1356393739410; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:02:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from SOL ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gr12sm8275056lab.3.2012.12.24.16.02.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:02:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <838va6wuiy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:22:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.215.42 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155869 Archived-At: Hi Eli, Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Juanma Barranquero >> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:59:45 +0100 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Monnier >> wrote: >> >> > I'm not happy about it either. >> [...] >> > Don't hold your breath. >> >> At which point (post-release) do we lose all faith and start looking >> for alternatives? Yesterday's post by Alexander Belchenko and the many >> replies it has generated (not!) isn't exactly reassuring. > > I asked Richard to see what can be done. Any updates on this? I hit this today, and it wasn't pleasant. --Dmitry