From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8876: 24.0.50; making `menu-bar-update-buffers' use another frame Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:46:42 +0200 Message-ID: <878v28rb8d.fsf@web.de> References: > > <88e3bec9-73e5-49d9-8afe-64b237c09f60@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371484090 8217 80.91.229.3 (17 Jun 2013 15:48:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8876-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 17 17:48:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobf7-0000xc-Di for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40687 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobf7-0006n5-3u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobf3-0006mm-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobf0-0006Dk-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobf0-0006DE-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobf0-0005Bi-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8876 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8876-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D8876.137148402219794 (code D ref 8876); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8876-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2013 15:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobe1-00058w-Fg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:61223) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uobdy-00058a-Pn for 8876-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([2.201.167.137]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkPRz-1UCVfO13EZ-00cNvr; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:46:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <88e3bec9-73e5-49d9-8afe-64b237c09f60@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:34:45 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qPrwmiHjNTv3+jMDTi/f4d8C3OYzaxaBx3d015+ujgf5Z52GS85 bkuxjI6UgRvOTQCIR6ASb+PU0rgYnsikFLmjHUYxA6J9TqydCdxUwo+5ReDLuO/cS62Irsp 9f7VToomJVie1ADcg9k+TIZqhIvixRpJLPJNysuEbFeeup1Vqi8m5Bz6+k4mhXDUE1T6AZq vi2QnUSV0uqZVLUSEyUig== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75253 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > But that is not compatible with the latest `pop-to-buffer'. > And when I look at the doc for `pop-to-buffer' I keel over. > > It tells me I can use an ACTION argument (as Martin did here, > with value `other-frame'). But it sends me off to the doc for > `display-buffer', whose description of parameter ACTION is > incomprehensible to me. WAY too complicated. I made the same experience. Now, a good and detailed description is given in the manual under (elisp) Display Action Functions. IMHO it's understandable. Regards, Michael.