From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: filenotify.el Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <878v1wy5tu.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87d2ra9z4x.fsf@gmx.de> <1383316.4Bc292dOgY@descartes> <87vc52yq04.fsf@gmx.de> <87a9md2y0e.fsf@gmx.de> <87d2r9vtze.fsf@gmx.de> <83li5whnk7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372278536 17058 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2013 20:28:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ruediger@c-plusplus.de, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 26 22:28:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrwKl-0004hZ-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:28:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40487 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrwKl-0003ky-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:28:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrwKh-0003kf-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrwKg-0006Yp-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:28:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:52392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrwKg-0006YW-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.19]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MFOSw-1V6Hor1jAS-00EPFS for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:28:49 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2013 20:28:49 -0000 Original-Received: from p5B2980C1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [91.41.128.193] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 26 Jun 2013 22:28:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19EoZkWlL9E3S5tUsrxpefyXTy2H0IfzHuwcBFce1 fx3rSSACoB+R0l In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:59:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161113 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Then the event should have an `inotify', `w32notify' or `gfile' tag. > Of course, that could be included in the "cookie" (which really should > be a new object type either in Lisp_Misc or in Lisp_Vectorlike). We have had that in the beginning ... it has been changed, in order to apply the same event handler for all the notification events. Which tag would you give an event when it is pushed by Tramp? `remote'? Honestly, I don't believe it is worth the trouble just now, since we haven't a problem yet. We could think about when it is necessary. Changing the event name wouldn't break anything; it is used internally only in the different *notify.{c,el} packages. And putting the tag into the descriptor, as I have proposed, would even not require a change in the event name. The descriptors must just be unique, that's all. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.