From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel" Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:09:41 +0200 Message-ID: <878v017uyy.fsf@web.de> References: <2aaa3bfa-1556-4135-b70a-1308e6cc7cdd@default> <8738qb816m.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376651425 15215 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2013 11:10:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14926@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 16 13:10:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHvF-0002Wb-6C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:10:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHvE-00071P-MB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHv3-0006oh-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHut-00013T-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHut-00011h-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHur-0004gD-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14926.137665139317964 (code B ref 14926); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2013 11:09:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHui-0004fe-NH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:55854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VAHug-0004fL-K9 for 14926@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.120.129]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ls9JH-1W6Y5g2YEJ-013yzz for <14926@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:09:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:45:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:khiLKiwQ+2NXMaOZtPQV6cNh4fdsHWbcBbfuolYzyj2nL10Y38C e7M/UH2N9NKJ0DpHN9LQ2a/rNmy1gTQO0BR4Wzx7qXAPI+/qwaVsO3A6VSTFCcL2uLPhGVN 8/nuHwOc1B3d/YqgYSBix1MotZkvRK13QobUeVoXu0FfyzJbiypC3oykQ3WZgUALFRAmy1E DfNywEzhF2LG34t0SnhSg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77427 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > FWIW, looking at the change I've had the same reaction as Drew. Well, it was the best short formulation that came to my mind. > The message still suggests that using make-variable-buffer-local other > than at toplevel is erroneous. > > It should say something like > > Use of make-variable-buffer-local other than at top-level could be > an error; perhaps you wanted to use make-local-variable? > > only shortish and better redacted. The "shortish" part is the problem. Is it even allowed to use more than one line? Presumably this kind of warning would not appear to often when you do things right, so using a longer formulation could be justified. Michael.