From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: add keyword search and display in details for list-packages Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:59:52 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878uw038uf.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <87wql1w6io.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87r4axu4dm.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87k3gorvs4.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87eh6adbqr.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87a9gyc8pp.fsf_-_@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txf5butd.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87y54g8o63.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87fvqk36n5.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87li0c1nyk.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haaxjrc5.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386172817 16730 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2013 16:00:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:00:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 04 17:00:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VoEs9-00051x-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:00:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49053 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoEs8-0003ui-VD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoEs1-0003sY-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:00:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoErv-0005Pt-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:00:13 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoErv-0005Pe-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VoErs-0004qU-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:00:04 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:00:04 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:00:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sdnmq8MOSxmo8ZN5mW5wXXN/dwk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166081 Archived-At: On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:52:38 +0200 Juri Linkov wrote: >> + (keywords (split-string (or (lm-header "keywords") "") >> + "," t "[ ]+")) JL> Isn't `lm-keywords-list' a better function to do this? It would be normally, but it doesn't trim space off the strings (the last argument is missing). This is compatible with older Emacsen but, I think, is less useful. So can I make the change to `lm-keywords-list' to add that last argument? Or do you and Stefan feel it should be used without worrying about trimming space? Sorry I didn't mention this earlier, I simply forgot. It was on my TODO list :) Ted