From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16602: 24.3.50; gnutls sometimes errors out Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:17 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878utj8ch2.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87txcl80xd.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87wqh390ao.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878utj64n0.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392029713 12474 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 10:55:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16602@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 11:55:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoWF-0002gW-Ud for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:55:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54834 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoWF-0007rC-L4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:55:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoW5-0007mh-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoW0-0000l8-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoVz-0000kx-Vw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoVz-0006ro-Ia for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:55:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:55:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16602 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16602-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16602.139202966426335 (code B ref 16602); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:55:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16602) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 10:54:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39204 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoVM-0006qg-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]:33513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCoVD-0006q6-4A for 16602@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i8so10115147qcq.22 for <16602@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:54:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=1vienYtwaoMzgxnTX3ygC9DuR+1W0MBpTFtpBEH/UbQ=; b=fIPN2fIZiLGSNYElEFsipLQJF4pGkW58OgUDX/SvPsnG/2N3AI5WWEo8cCDtbhauyZ fCTh9CPs64RlFOXZW2LKdFvc/ARnECWqKivVLjQMIFPpOyXYp1ax/maiX0Wfzb6VB44E H6Aypwe0B9yv+TU/w8dVXwafdF9hxhkQ0TbPE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=1vienYtwaoMzgxnTX3ygC9DuR+1W0MBpTFtpBEH/UbQ=; b=BDLe5KWvYy0xkRYUVWKKpwEQO6/PnBSo4y5LF7tZyolFJWVH+VFqRraLxc7tDJZ/3w 7gyQypnkwaMEa+nnxNmWTphnDDy8Gv541w1IkxenKZwiBhyqMX2K3LlrksJveI54i+nh gFqrwajDqyYg//CUU8CGtDyUfbeUJXJ47yNKZTgsqYKcH1/gUb323f6MhfFtwY2cpDga NuQMAne02mJNYYDOQYz38TEQAMo2SZ65Feo4YWFhEJNiobuZ1HzeMce7eGUReAYqJXqF dQos52/EFjSAWbyM/QRXcAtgRcSn4QfpiP7vSjWPaU2c6wak4yltMgXwxQQe6LSUmwOV N9HA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsfVgs3qAIZ/lbQLPmvL4OGYFz1Ccash6ENPYQMRoyVnfvBo9r9yPHOKYlj4eWlGXWe9VK X-Received: by 10.229.193.136 with SMTP id du8mr29118433qcb.11.1392029649728; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:54:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm41768895qat.5.2014.02.10.02.54.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:54:09 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <878utj64n0.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:14:11 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85257 Archived-At: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:14:11 -0800 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I'm not aware of anything that could be causing this. I've definitely >> not changed anything recently in the GnuTLS integration code. >> >> As a first step, I would check with `gnutls-cli' whether the same >> invocation has a similar problem. LI> Doesn't seem to be. I repeated the following ten times, and I got the LI> output below each time. LI> Hm. If I set `gnutls-log-level' to 10, then everything works fine, too? LI> Sounds kinda timing-related... Could be, and I hate those "subtle" bugs. LI> Oh, and now I'm unable to reproduce the problem with a log level of 0. OK, let's see if it reappears. Give it a few days. Ted