From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk still not open Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:43:32 +0530 Message-ID: <878us732oj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <6xwqfxhl88.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83txb1mcsy.fsf@gnu.org> <87siqlku0i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqfxari2.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ha70kyy3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <5323B66B.5070405@yandex.ru> <837g7vdg70.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnx5l9is.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395159363 18030 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2014 16:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Emacs developers , Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 18 17:16:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPwgP-0004pF-FH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:16:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36313 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPwgO-0007hY-TQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPwgD-0007gH-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPwg4-0007Rl-Rn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]:64231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPwg4-0007RX-Bi; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y10so7295173pdj.36 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=nKrUTeS8jwlFieYEPAHID6ix9i7NMlkcONEG+5DHjyQ=; b=XmZeer6P20mAjkW/MUm/yUyAbcCA8fJ/xGCf5dpV5G4DP7dT1uF8jvlxBcLTBZ0FYI WdUvbS+XAp96uUosBB202NkiamXzimxTBecRQ1hjp13uv83XoEV0O3y+y/7ufxCE8w7O mWDv+6LB34b6KjuUzODh2Owtw8OK3xGw/jfy6pbZ0EZlq0pDMURjdmKwNJc8R3m9IzHX lzJpJRGHPbnj3nkJkF1qGIEfQ65r+Z5K7quVeGt9xfn6ofXwHoRCCsX/TN3gpuOOo5Fn QDieGJ3j072l4k+cF9GbzOxVpBNp1F13v8WF9hvpDgCqjk1GmQzAHvewEf65BZXFi6JC 8PLg== X-Received: by 10.68.212.10 with SMTP id ng10mr34785006pbc.95.1395159342841; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.63.194.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zb2sm53980125pbc.30.2014.03.18.09.15.38 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:15:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:38:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170479 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > I'm not bragging; True. You are whining. > I *HATE* writing. (If you managed to get here) A mere feeling is of little relevance to this list. It is better to contextualize that feeling and articulate clearly how that feeling is of interest to emacs-devel (i.e., how does your feelings "affect" - positively, negatively or neutrally - Emacs development) So, 1. IF the code changes MUST be accompanied by documentation and 2. IF your patches are without documentation 3. THEN they will be queued 4. UNTIL the documentation is written. `IF' in (1) and (2) are big `IFs'. I am just describing a possible (even if remote) scenario.