From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug#766395: emacs/gnus: Uses s_client to for SSL. Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:45:05 +0100 Message-ID: <878uk0y6wu.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <20141022193441.GA11872@roeckx.be> <87zjcnj2k6.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87mw8mzmxj.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141023143702.3897e618@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <8761fazkx7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141023145721.12ed0820@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87vbnay5lf.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141023154223.45f2c9eb@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <874muuihjh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141023230048.13f8234a@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87wq7pgpif.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141024171421.78720abe@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87r3xxgmx2.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141024204202.276dbb1f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <8738a95t6b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141027153954.08930677@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87lho04qvn.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414482105 2783 80.91.229.3 (28 Oct 2014 07:41:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:41:45 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 28 08:41:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj1PD-0007jl-Mm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:41:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37739 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj1PD-0001Gd-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj1P3-00014l-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:41:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj1Ox-0001UG-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:41:17 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:11381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj1Ow-0001U5-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (79.45.68.40) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 544CD76B0059549A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:41:09 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj1Sr-0004vH-SW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:45:14 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87lho04qvn.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:04:12 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175917 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () "Stephen J. Turnbull" () Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:04:12 +0900 Perry E. Metzger writes: > > While my credentials in security aren't anywhere > > near as good as yours, unfortunately, you are > > obviously an extremist >=20 > Whatever. You can keep calling me names all you > like -- but it doesn't make your opinion any more > correct. Indeed, no matter what names you call > people, it won't increase the evidence for your > position. Absolutely correct. But then I didn't claim it increased the evidence for *my* position. I said that it dilutes *your* authority (and you are an authority AFAICS), in particular when you are claiming that some particular position of yours is "not extreme". And that's all I said. It's important to choose precisely between: =2D Your words/actions/dissipations are ADJ. =2D You are an ADJist. on TX, because it will surely be distinguished on RX. [recip clamped] =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRPSYQACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJlmgCdGt29yAYz+JBVCcoIfWdKbQj9 +d8AnRAbmHPblCmrCtfL+f9B6EVjdwZr =97UC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--