From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15880: Compute C declarations for DEFSYMs automatically. Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:10:42 +0100 Message-ID: <878uhb8xt9.fsf@igel.home> References: <5282C8F4.5010806@cs.ucla.edu> <5494D719.4040507@cs.ucla.edu> <5499FFF1.9050106@cs.ucla.edu> <54AAC905.1020906@cs.ucla.edu> <54AAD51C.7020207@cs.ucla.edu> <83lhlh83a3.fsf@gnu.org> <54AAE504.5090701@cs.ucla.edu> <83egr980v9.fsf@gnu.org> <54AB0E11.5050908@cs.ucla.edu> <837fx08u67.fsf@gnu.org> <54ADDA79.3050105@cs.ucla.edu> <83387l7670.fsf@gnu.org> <54B002F1.4030305@cs.ucla.edu> <831tn367o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9vz90o7.fsf@igel.home> <83twzz4r22.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420837878 26255 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2015 21:11:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 21:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 15880@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 09 22:11:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpq-00063Y-Rt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:11:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52229 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpq-00030l-1I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpm-00030T-Kn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpi-0002e7-RA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpi-0002dv-O1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gph-0004KB-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15880 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15880-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15880.142083785116607 (code B ref 15880); Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15880) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2015 21:10:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpX-0004Jm-Dm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:10:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:45944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gpR-0004JX-BA for 15880@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:10:50 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kJxmg6Hkwz3hj9d; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 22:10:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kJxmg13FTzvh20; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 22:10:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zDm6VIxZTxhE; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 22:10:42 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: t+UzOAfHt0KCEvGCLVNNCP/4Db4UGKPvE1x0+Jqp3FfmXShIGPttlhpZI4QewSHr Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-155-54.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.155.54]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 22:10:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A0602C1B61; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 22:10:42 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Yow! Now I get to think about all the BAD THINGS I did to a BOWLING BALL when I was in JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL! In-Reply-To: <83twzz4r22.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:50:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98145 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: Paul Eggert , 15880@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:08:56 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 08:33:53 -0800 >> >> From: Paul Eggert >> >> CC: rgm@gnu.org, 15880@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > Could we instead just keep the previous semantics of XIL and XLI, >> >> > please? They are used in a few places outside lisp.h, so now all of >> >> > those places need to be audited and most probably changed. Why isn't >> >> > it better to change the implementation of just 2 macros instead? >> >> >> >> XIL and XLI haven't changed, and have the same semantics as before: they convert >> >> between Lisp_Object and EMACS_INT without altering the bits (i.e., they are >> >> no-ops at the machine level). >> > >> > That's not what their previous semantics was. They converted between >> > a Lisp integer and EMACS_INT. >> >> No, that's called XINT. > > OK, a C integer, not EMACS_INT. But you already knew that, of course. I don't understand what you are trying to say. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."