Stefan Monnier writes: >> I also liked seq-some-p returning the matching element over cl-some >> returning the value returned by the predicate. > > But if the matched element is nil ... If the function is not supposed to return non-nil if an element is matched but the element itself, then would it be ok? OTOH there would be again no way to differentiate between no element found and nil being found in the sequence. Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr