From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21633: 25.0.50; assertion failure, self-insert-command with negative argument Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:26:32 +0200 Message-ID: <878u7g2nev.fsf@members.fsf.org> References: <87k2r0cqe9.fsf@members.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444134987 11305 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2015 12:36:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21633@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 06 14:36:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRTZ-0003WC-5m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:36:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRTY-00020Q-Bv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRTR-0001kx-TK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRJi-0001Sq-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRJi-0001Sk-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRJi-0003Bh-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87k2r0cqe9.fsf@members.fsf.org> Resent-From: Nicolas Richard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21633 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21633-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21633.144413435712243 (code B ref 21633); Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21633) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2015 12:25:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRJc-0003BN-FB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:34345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjRJZ-0003BD-EQ for 21633@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:25:54 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4IAG29E1akD4Xx/2dsb2JhbABeglWCFKlHAQEBAQEBBgWWNIYaggkBAQEBAQGBC4QlAQEEeRAIAyElDwEEQwYTiC6+egEBCCKGLIVFhQ2ENQWWBI5uhDmCcJJuY4JEgUA8M4g/AQEB Original-Received: from mathsrv4.ulb.ac.be (HELO localhost) ([164.15.133.241]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2015 14:25:51 +0200 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107369 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > XFASTINT unboxes the Lisp_Object. The value is a plain number. So XFASTINT (n) in this case should be -1 instead of 4611686018427387903. Thanks for the information and for fixing the bug. As an additionnal information, please note that this seems related to --with-wide-int (at least I get proper error reporting when not using this option). Shouldn't XFASTINT be made to work in that case instead of using XINT ? -- Nico