From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Asynchronous DNS Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:06:22 +1100 Message-ID: <878u331tht.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87si1gx6wz.fsf@gnus.org> <86y4b5zvzt.fsf@gmail.com> <8760y9kwrk.fsf@gnus.org> <87wpqpjgwy.fsf@gnus.org> <83a8nk1cxk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9hrnc8x.fsf@gnus.org> <86io27obqf.fsf@realize.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454396846 13870 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2016 07:07:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 08:07:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQV3O-00056X-GY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:07:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55454 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQV3N-0007se-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:07:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQV3A-0007sX-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQV35-0000uS-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:06:56 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQV35-0000uB-82; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:06:51 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aQV2h-000590-9O; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:06:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86io27obqf.fsf@realize.ch> (Alain Schneble's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:41:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aQV2h-000590-9O MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455001588.17439@cME3MTjuEDRAjiZUFnHv+g X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199155 Archived-At: Alain Schneble writes: > What happens if background thread(s) are still alive (e.g. blocking, > waiting for a network response) and Emacs is killed? Will it wait for > the background threads to terminate or will it forcibly kill them? I'm guessing they'll die along with Emacs. That's what happens with threads started by libraries currently, I think. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no