From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22754: 25.1.50; Rmail does not follow RFC 2822 Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:17:22 +0100 Message-ID: <878u272v65.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87d1rquzlg.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456510710 25051 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2016 18:18:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 22754@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 19:18:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxx-00065x-2b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:18:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxv-0005iq-Vx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxr-0005iN-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxm-0007AI-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxm-0007A1-ES for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxm-0002Di-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Marcin Borkowski Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22754 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22754-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22754.14565106498492 (code B ref 22754); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22754) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2016 18:17:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxF-0002Cu-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:34315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZMxD-0002Cl-Cv for 22754@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:17:27 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B079D2005; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:17:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uJ8a6rYYBQhA; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:17:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [109.232.24.28]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47CAE9D2004; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:17:23 +0100 (CET) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 25.1.50.3 In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113902 Archived-At: On 2016-02-26, at 18:43, Glenn Morris wrote: > Marcin Borkowski wrote: > >> Rmail inserts lower-case field names in the header, which goes against >> RFC 2822 (pp. 22 and 23, see >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#page-22). > > Andy Moreton wrote: > >> This should be "In-Reply-To" as described in RFC 2822 section 3.6.4. > > Going back to this, what exactly are you referring to in the RFC? > All I can find on the subject of case is an explicit statement that > values are case insensitive (as one would expect): I've been told that if it is not stated explicitly that field names are case-insensitive, they are not, and their names should nit be changed in any way. > 1.2.2. Syntactic notation > > Characters will be specified either by a decimal value (e.g., the value > %d65 for uppercase A and %d97 for lowercase A) or by a case-insensitive > literal value enclosed in quotation marks (e.g., "A" for either > uppercase or lowercase > > So the fact they happen to write "In-Reply-To" implies nothing about case. Seems it does. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University