From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13341: 24.3.50; define minibuffer keymaps in Lisp Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: <878tzw5v9i.fsf@gnus.org> References: <7FD9C2FA6AD04EA3BEA0104018A91477@us.oracle.com> <87wpnh4jyz.fsf@gnus.org> <5d53eda8-bce4-48a2-bc11-430e15064a1f@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461941203 28851 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2016 14:46:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13341@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 16:46:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9gb-0000Ud-RL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:46:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54966 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9gY-0007uN-3G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9gP-0007hZ-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9gD-0000VM-9y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:46:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9gD-0000Ue-7I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9g9-0003M4-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13341 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13341-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13341.146194111810397 (code B ref 13341); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13341) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 14:45:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9fR-0002hT-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9fP-0002fU-UK for 13341@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9fN-0001t0-FB; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:45:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5d53eda8-bce4-48a2-bc11-430e15064a1f@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:41:41 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117190 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> > Why are `minibuffer-local-ns-map' and minibuffer-local-map still defined >> > in C code? Can we please move the definitions to Lisp now? >> >> This is presumably because they're referenced from >> `read-no-blanks-input' (etc.) and it saves a couple of lines to define >> it in C, in that case? > > Yes. The question is, "Can we please move the definitions to Lisp now?" I don't see any advantage to doing so. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no