From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:46:24 +0000 Message-ID: <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481125641 26117 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2016 15:47:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:47:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25084@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 16:47:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeR4-0005Gv-MU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:47:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeR8-0004eV-A0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeR0-0004eA-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQw-0001TW-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQw-0001TS-Dw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQw-0000AC-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25084 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25084-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25084.1481125599601 (code B ref 25084); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 15:46:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQZ-00009b-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:46:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk ([185.116.214.213]:51701) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQX-00009P-Go for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:46:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7EBC4DBC for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mycpanelcloud.co.uk Original-Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D35AC4C0F for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com (unknown [31.216.48.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0BFC47BD for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dxx49uFZQ3wWT1Lsy3oQNN8L5opmtOCnzTm3ZzN3Z7c=; b=WWgoANEAQUw4BFNimFXsDl6ji ALpeOwBX8tZ0LVgN0+iQdc4edQNaJFawmVyPXImK7zjVduRQ1VLpeASVg9WP2kNk/0qaVdeTeW6mh MxXTlmH5WOQwdcpbihEHmNWUxUxqieWldURXmxvzimBAmIyW0x7avXjJmcsCKXealqY3O0HDoatvl UQwHeO7nPQwPICKYco/1fb+INoezIP9do4DSsxzM19IsvhQ1UmdEYe8BsBfawnhyQRIPP0g/PrPOL LGZLCHjQ1ivxW4SmDQ2hC3x5NZoH0Q0Fp7BrS4S2Oidxt4kE+yKXHvYVqzGeSfk4wQH8bbQ8PBqtm 8w9xGeItA==; Original-Received: from cpc2-benw10-2-0-cust42.gate.cable.virginm.net ([77.103.60.43]:58250 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQN-0018rb-Dg; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:46:27 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:20:18 +0100") X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126606 Archived-At: Nicolas Petton writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > > Hi Glenn, > >> In the 25.1.90 tarball, files.el is newer than files.elc. >> This ought to be impossible, if the tarfile was created from a >> bootstrap. > > It was, but I might have pulled a commit after bootstrapping (Eli > mentioned that reason to me, and while I don't remember doing that, it > has to be the case). > >> It causes building to recompile files.el, which is harmless but should >> not be needed in a release. > > Indeed. I'll keep this bug report open until the next pretest. Can we add something to the build that checks this before the tar step? Phil