From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About curly quotes (again) [Was: Emacs 26.1 release branch created] Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:03:54 +0200 Message-ID: <878tgw9cnp.fsf@jane> References: <83377mls4d.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmm6h8vr.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919180944.GB19168@ACM> <838thah71i.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919194356.GC19168@ACM> <20170919210925.GF19168@ACM> <87y3paypfz.fsf@jane> <87efqxvf26.fsf@jane> <83377dboij.fsf@gnu.org> <87a81luru4.fsf@jane> <83ing8ak4v.fsf@gnu.org> <8760c6vqtz.fsf@jane> <87wp4ltz0a.fsf@jane> <83d1698zke.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9psaa8x.fsf@jane> <83vak04mfl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506801884 4856 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2017 20:04:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 20:04:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, acm@muc.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 22:04:38 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyO06-0000hX-1E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:04:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40268 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyO0D-0002pe-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:04:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyNzh-0002aI-O8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyNzg-0007Ld-Qu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:34357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyNzc-0007Ie-NT; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE48AE6262; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:04:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HssDwX13Co4s; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:04:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (apn-31-1-7-39.dynamic.gprs.plus.pl [31.1.7.39]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6B3EE620A; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:03:59 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <83vak04mfl.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218976 Archived-At: On 2017-09-30, at 10:31, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Marcin Borkowski >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforg= e.net, jwiegley@gmail.com, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, acm@muc.de >> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:22 +0200 >>=20 >> >> In theory, yes. But: `C-x '. >> > >> > Not sure what is your problem with this" "i C-x DEL RET" finds that >> > binding nicely. >>=20 >> Funny: i C-x DEL RET works, but i C-x not. > > "C-x " should NOT work. Key bindings are indexed without the > <..> markup. > >> (OTOH, i C-x works again.) > > How do you mean "works"? Where in the manual does it land you? > >> >> (Although this is obviously a bug/omission.) >> > >> > Is it? >>=20 >> So probably yes, at least an inconsistency (a minor one, I admit). > > There was a small number of incorrect index entries for key bindings, > I fixed them now. Thanks. >> >> And the section on interactive codes is really long, and I search >> >> for it often enough that the curly quotes do annoy me. >> > >> > Again, not sure what's the problem. here's what I'd do: >> > >> > "i interactive code RET" followed by "C-s ^" (for example) >>=20 >> How about C-s P? ;-) > > Why would I do something like that? To find the explanation of the interactive code `P'? (or =E2=80=98P=E2=80= =99)? > Anyway, I think we can close this discussion now. Agreed. Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski