From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24749: Making sure syntax-propertize is called Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:03:04 -0500 Message-ID: <878te8em93.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <83shrqrxzo.fsf@gnu.org> <834m45snaf.fsf@gnu.org> <8337jpsjc9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513044256 11709 195.159.176.226 (12 Dec 2017 02:04:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:04:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24749@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 03:04:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZvS-0002cv-IV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:04:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZvZ-0002xW-Hn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:04:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZvR-0002xQ-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZvO-0005sR-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZvO-0005s7-2c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZvN-0007rD-Qo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24749 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24749-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24749.151304419530106 (code B ref 24749); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24749) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2017 02:03:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZuc-0007pV-IJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:03:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]:38480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOZua-0007pD-ME for 24749@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:03:13 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id r6so20591865itr.3 for <24749@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:03:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4TiuuUcFFmHlCM0jTy6RDPR91KwxOsEok4JF/f9uHC8=; b=UK0ikE28Dv2aJYaSdbeLlz1FQzlZPKzJ2+HLln01wcBhM04STA5o4Gd32FmF2gWbGs ROeAkZ9Zhut/5/W8dwEIFt3Rlkcj1iv80oej6y01VLdvbNArqj5fMpFe2pCmwLKX5zHX KJGAQlhThU7bJTqdQTc22tpmbpWvNrgLez6REd7wpcB0Rr19u8UN2cSt+MVQ8M2vTXbw 7HBQ/2a45qLU86JCfpwCzAu9aiAolOaU24HhAv0hoFvcjv6m1TfonZhfddcAsI/AlsIU W4FK9E7a3Eif4nYQfb+59GuJ12pv7VcNzJSOuF4d6AZoMAVeStVaVTCDM7h4EQi5A8tI YQ0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4TiuuUcFFmHlCM0jTy6RDPR91KwxOsEok4JF/f9uHC8=; b=Y8xQRN6B7UkgEUBGOumBF4Ei9n6In0yIBMEAM2FkJZ9N3ZVW7KBsyS7H4fJeVo6Qvs fS+NecV3Githho633xJkhguHA92wTyWMSqVjh1QokvDqBi57hikRpRKTWQkpN2PQZcoR 9Ot2dFnMtzIPMNz0Jqlsw7qpvP0xoac/Btgzl1U18ysyUQ0H6XVyXZHHMKBSWfc4w2cD S7gaFknMB3PnfcnIHSGQprSlhwZqIUCXghRo5nlAPy/A5eQqUXZIghFzTPUW09+C/34y 49Rc0t7Zg6/wyM0UwZ1MGr+1X4YHt8WoCXqK7qrS5mLV7sZRtQfueRmxMKD9TDG9F9S1 uFpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJCkLW5gcv8BbxvOsgWNIY6+EPkVm7QFiKJQ0S8GET+/6eIEQR5 4aWEYPSGpunaYmtx5cAfyOzmRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov0MRTw7wamixpEmVlA3h2qeUDRYy57Avcu0inFx1UVVp9Ov3MmrLoeiCFL7RTcWWVJwahnUA== X-Received: by 10.36.95.5 with SMTP id r5mr531382itb.70.1513044186984; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:03:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm4420364ita.12.2017.12.11.18.03.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:03:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8337jpsjc9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:27:50 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140965 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: 24749@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:34:27 -0400 >> >> I think I may have described it incorrectly: the issue that it solves is >> one that's been around forever. It's just that 25.1 fixes this issue in >> most cases and hence creates a new expectations that the issue is fixed, >> but there's still a hole if you try to use navigation commands before >> any syntax-propertize call, which this patch intends to fix. >> >> So I don't think this is urgent, and since the fix (whichever we choose) >> affects (by nature) "all" modes, I don't think it's safe enough for >> emacs-25. > > Fine, then master it is. Should this finally be applied to master then?