From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30213: 26.0.91; shell buffer not displayed when not erased and async-shell-command-display-buffer is used Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:23:28 +0000 Message-ID: <878tcpfmnz.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87a7x5ejsu.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516666954 5418 195.159.176.226 (23 Jan 2018 00:22:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:22:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 30213@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Branham Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 01:22:30 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edmLo-00006f-Qh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:22:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNp-0005qH-0V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNi-0005pz-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNe-0004Vi-TK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNe-0004VF-Oq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNe-0004Z9-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30213 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30213-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30213.151666702117522 (code B ref 30213); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30213) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2018 00:23:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38760 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNJ-0004YY-FH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:43394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edmNH-0004YJ-Ij for 30213@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g1so19530021wmg.2 for <30213@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:23:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=01MOgTEPO7uhsHX76UHi+3x/RUtlkQQzqEWglLyfe4k=; b=OSrempaVJehLhrgkfCNYGEBIcrstGy7+xfdfRRFsQZ/7efZlzDoq8iiSH1MyaGXc3M XGHxobmqfE3U+Ol143pTzE9/yf71XXalcPeojSuSA4NQ70QT+Fvf9Gie8BLmBgDzNn6F PV5y12VPTxZI6YycWOnfMDh4V/25QMPAlm4868llGiA3/MtzT8KOvb2/EGrqknZ4A9ae 4YGNR/tv1SURoWQzkQGMzxrArOLT4DRyB5+jfc61UReHdcm2eC133y/bNcjF4IVusRu4 Z3lRu0+bVo3k9y9xVMYWu8ytmknzzgYdW94AWPzz6Rf8wTMDsm2PLg16sIP3WIE3OfWu By9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=01MOgTEPO7uhsHX76UHi+3x/RUtlkQQzqEWglLyfe4k=; b=ldQd9RwxvugGC7C+wFJactzv1JGFXDylh1fCcg6ctIf9IYR3HKZ6NN8hyLmdwpqW0v 39fUSAi8n5AflxOh7wA9gG+FGVDEIOsWlwbm2Isqo1QoqY2Rg8+k28u/N3F9Mlmy//R5 F7t8ecvnsNZ1iTbksJrVpaW86fRW0DAR6qo3en6FUF6qn7jz4bnHqgeWPw8GHn8z9iyD bJCcZV9zzfkMLXQnlpLHUPcXf4lpRiCtWNZwqqTyiCYU/FAAURr+6cR8ii+zoBlBWW46 2mGBHSfi7jiMqlLGMoHtonPCSiZEuoideTeDsZAjswXo8R7IK0+GZp9v5megcD/J9BAR 7iiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfRfQ0qzc0xNo2D7tsn+48XV8+Vh8Id+FCKipzAus+rj32r9cRs GfixHIvVm+YcxVAseCi6P1nfgA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225SoXIfxvRStZKiasby4QrpK26WDFT55Aepndkn17ZtjE0MR0HDz5efHWwherEgLo4DgqECsw== X-Received: by 10.80.135.205 with SMTP id 13mr16663192edz.253.1516667013847; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:23:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:4f41:8c80:9929:5bdb:4629:fab8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w17sm12339838eda.96.2018.01.22.16.23.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:23:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a7x5ejsu.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:10:41 -0600") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142408 Archived-At: Alex Branham writes: > With async-shell-command-display-buffer set to t and > shell-command-dont-erase-buffer set to 'beg-last-output, async shell > buffers do not get displayed after the second async call, presumably > because the buffer doesn't get erased so there isn't a first line > written. Just to clarify: are you setting shell-command-dont-erase-buffer to beg-last-output or beg-last-out? The former isn't a valid value for this user option. Either way, I cannot reproduce what I think you are doing in a build of today's master branch, but I think it would help if you listed the precise steps leading to the output buffer failing to display. Thanks, -- Basil