From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43597: 28.0.50; arc-mode.el fails to display a ZIP file Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:58:36 +0200 Message-ID: <878scynek3.fsf@gmx.net> References: <874knnvt79.fsf@gmx.net> <87y2ky7wi4.fsf@igel.home> <87zh5evrgw.fsf@gmx.net> <83a6xetmxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgb6qqft.fsf@gmx.net> <833636tcx0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh5erxm2.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2kyrui6.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7rmnjt7.fsf@gmx.net> <83r1qqrpy7.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8lurpq3.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu1ernfi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36253"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 43597@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 25 16:01:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoHv-0009EO-PB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:01:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoHu-0000xT-2w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:01:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoFZ-0007iF-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoFZ-0001xi-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoFZ-0003ms-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43597 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43597-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43597.160104233414545 (code B ref 43597); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2020 13:58:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoFS-0003mX-Ep for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:58:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:36339) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLoFO-0003mH-8U for 43597@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:58:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1601042323; bh=VgK5D9mxllgMoYvzINDjsInsDMohx7Nc7AkwZM5xNyk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Wgjym2p4nUKM+LFNrAfIYUaLDnzT4HQnoq1/iJZK1dlSt+fX++teXZFkl8pzzevRI YOGGwIB8vqcH1hu+2OU2Bt4BF1Qld0v3ppxiHoQ9IzhOwOCLLR+SZh/bV4E1nleZSV qSWWgBEimSKXM0VSqLwi14tXY8o3jDSjBC588zHE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobe-jhalfs ([94.220.126.19]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MDQeU-1kCQ3p1DGQ-00AUUr; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:58:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mu1ernfi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:33:21 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1AJ8bVOnMeZ5ZVwRyhtC1GcVTxoyU9EF9SifSriSDih0gZNdgfp BQhixyT+4KHyf/3pjuPr2dCjGxeAupZ6jzdxj2MoofDqWnvrEZyDrNHQjIiYkwof/oHGli+ hmxhrjDnGRj/qhMGbV9qXqRYmDflCUzh4jBV2xMcUsN1HjAKAnFDYriWNC7NrgXXSHxqDaf xNv7UJUCSpxSzDMIrAJBg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:NJ9BAS8vBhA=:M/OWB4hhw6DPGCUpCIMVPV dt7sKZEQR7Fih85Ab1NYokdkIFwzokKwTkNL+rCuuu9S5XK5LnLvqg6HYZXzMt5BGEkW6FoEQ W4udoYyIiSEDTyDAfpwGvydNK0B32QVROsIeHgpzIygPSEUnJGNRRvlluYoOK98m0KVOZorVL flZZNgehg2y9lMAww+Oj7tTLNlNbcpXmIfdk1k9NgKeBG+ZP2eQh7m/B1tpi2hLnA9vNNDLW1 gCE6hDetOLbb2n3S2rxF+83ie3UxvHMf4thm4GvhklW3V3cK+muTU4SQpTAN8IBNM/HGvI6EJ VaeBgwachqjYXCnhbcBkSSwAVrnU95YEQluJj7vH9+hxc9UsK9+k5PC5Z2LHegEY3PtZQV9sp 71Wfv0nV4p4MfYm2GDvfVa7znB2TlMrpkze9XuU3AXez4ROKuN/2kfxskHIvsXSi83FmEs57u 0yHLD+dWr22fuE4wIPony5Akx3p4dDywxHuXPHrqCowsl4Ao4pMfj6nYmUX7YztjHhd3F7/vr WrFnZXkItObXe6CMF1lvV3zxR7NNGdgoqcYm6G5PG42tacLY7x9kTvovZhRroay+aM3EiZudY GblU0VMk8tyBoSVRDF/XzTcK9MhhpcJdzy9Pt8oT4fpjLA86oyw0Ai+STT7GvkY6oulxPRXE8 t/bMN0OPjf8/ye6zZgljAUcEe/DK2BmdHtE0XXIr89vRAewCEsWF/kcIQ6dbz9mzSvfrV6FJn hKsqJClhGx13yYIO2QIhoG+VM1QarOt0Zxfgq7nOP3kDTKKphiXKIZn4GS9/rkBGHIsI+510 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188972 Archived-At: On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:33:21 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:43:48 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: 43597@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:38:56 +0300 >> > From: Eli Zaretskii >> > Cc: 43597@debbugs.gnu.org >> > >> > Thanks, with this file I do see the problem. >> >> Oops, I spoke too soon, using the wrong version of Emacs to test this. >> >> The change -1 =3D> #xffffffff fixes the problem with this file as well. >> So I guess the remaining issues rear their ugly heads in a 64-bit >> Emacs, and I need to debug there... > > Wrong again, sigh... This has nothing to do with 64-bit builds. > > Anyway, here's the proposed patch, please test: It works for me (at first I applied it to master and the patch partly failed to apply, then I looked at the line numbers and realized it was for Emacs 27). Thanks. Steve Berman