From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [feature/rcirc-update] Reconnects don't seem to work anymore Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:48:05 +0000 Message-ID: <878s3aw5yy.fsf@posteo.net> References: <871r98af1n.fsf@gnu.org> <877dj0wtwr.fsf@posteo.net> <87y2bg8y0k.fsf@gnu.org> <871r938u3v.fsf@gnu.org> <8735tjxft7.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgvqykkv.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmwmx0gl.fsf@posteo.net> <87o8c6fls8.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf7aw91d.fsf@posteo.net> <87eed2fdvl.fsf@gnu.org> <87czsmw77c.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nqfblz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34108"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 16 10:48:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltRE5-0008h2-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:48:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60610 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltRE3-0005fM-LM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:48:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltRDX-00050z-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:58987) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltRDV-0005Xu-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06EBA240029 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:48:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1623833287; bh=ftmsBKV8vlWLUgNdAypiGzRQmWnry0EsEco+bxfD0UE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=Rwsdg8lm4xkxIomNC1pBX6AfvkhdjX8Uy9F+y18eWo++LiVycjJq7ivFg9NyOgR2Q 7/SFZJPYS/nu0W7cN7E1GDvrjCCIK/pMPdLhRomyGUfTHbMiGxHKjXad0xygpeF9nO c/FJpdij7B5O6G2XicwDDaV8k+APfX1dUzVUECi6mDdBe5UnPhel9mbAtzOn22PY3R ZEfE3VLE/7YxBj7dEhykSZsqx5I6ffYlMibTigkrQ6HJ3/lhEKpCuE3r1NSeXb+hK1 gSTFZkl/UnRzi7b8PAwCaHMOeWhLqoITSp/kanBGQYUdHOAZT+soySCyimK6Bn7SUd ymlG7Codvxakw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4G4f3B3TzRz9rxT; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:48:06 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <87a6nqfblz.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:35:12 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270841 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: >>> Fine with me but I'm keen to learn about the use-case where the >>> current behavior is wanted. I guess there is a use-case because >>> otherwise the IRC server wouldn't have that implemented as-is. >> >> I was thinking about when you want to message a friend who is >> currently marked as away. > > "Marked as being away" is different to offline/doesn't exist, right? So > if I'd "/msg philipk Hello" I'd still want that only philipk receives > the message and not some other user p, ph, phi, or whoever. Yes, of course. If rcirc is parsing any substring of a token, something else is broken. My hope is that the changes to rcirc-define-command should have fixed it (for now). >>> And IMHO when messaging nickserv or other service bots receiving >>> confidential data, the current behavior is not acceptable. I'm not sure >>> if the automatic authentication in terms of `rcirc-authinfo' checks if >>> nickserv (or whatever) is actually available and, if not, falls into >>> that trap just as I did by messaging the non-existent NickServ manually. >> >> That is true. It shouldn't be hard to add a check to ensure this. > > Great. > > Bye, > Tassilo -- Philip K.