From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50935: minibuffer-electric-default-mode interface Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 19:46:56 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <878rz74dxb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87k0ixq6wt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r1d285o4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874k9wc8je.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838rz74ggk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32149"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Stefan Kangas , 50935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 05 20:08:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXora-0008D2-7z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:08:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56308 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXorZ-0000Tv-5o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:08:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnpK-0002Qj-Vy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnpK-0007fJ-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnpK-000483-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50935.163345328914204 (code B ref 50935); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2021 17:01:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnom-0003gk-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:53525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnoi-0003YV-PV for 50935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:01:27 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 152CC200007; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:01:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <838rz74ggk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 05 Oct 2021 18:52:11 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216478 Archived-At: >> > The following patch makes the prompt more readable: >> > >> > Send signal to 3 processes [TERM]: >> >> Sounds good to me. > > It could be confusing. Previously, the prompt was > > Send signal [TERM] The previous prompt was: Send signal [3 processes] (default TERM): or with customized minibuffer-default-prompt-format: Send signal [3 processes] [TERM]: This was too confusing. > So it was much more clear that "TERM" refers to "signal" and vice > versa. Now we have "3 processes" in the way, and someone could think > "TERM" refers to the processes or something. > > How about this instead: > > Signal N processes with [SIGTERM]: > > Note that I deliberately added the "SIG" part so that it would be more > clear this is the name of a signal. Sorry, the phrase "Signal N processes" is too difficult to comprehend - it's diffucult to see that "signal" is a verb here.