From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Migrating to sourcehut - what's missing? Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:41:32 -0800 Message-ID: <878rwdbppv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <871r26w27h.fsf@thornhill.no> <87lf0dq08j.fsf@thornhill.no> <87v8zh6azv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zgot648w.fsf@posteo.net> <878rwdpry1.fsf@thornhill.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12991"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:STLGfMs33yOtQWfWv0b698YiF2Q= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 21 22:43:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzmv6-0003Ek-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:43:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzmv5-0002Q8-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzmtD-00005O-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:60078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzmtB-0002Tz-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzmt9-0000ws-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:41:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282639 Archived-At: Theodor Thornhill writes: >> >> So that would be something like git.sr.ht/~eliz/emacs or >> git.sr.ht/~lars/emacs? This makes me wonder how "hard coded" the >> user >> names are in the sourcehut code base. Assuming the GNU project would >> host its sourcehut instance on the domain git.gnu.org, srht.gnu.org, >> source.gnu.org, or whatever, would it still be possible to remove >> the >> "~..." username part? (I know this is as minor of an issue as it >> gets, >> it's just curiosity). >> >> Until then, it seems that the username "~gnu" is not taken. Maybe >> someone more entitled than me could mirror a few repositories over >> there >> for testing purposes? >> > > See my other mail just sent. ~emacs is owned by me as for now, unless > ~gnu is preferred :) Sounds like a good start! We could try assigning a few bug reports to sr.ht and its workflow, and see how that goes -- merging the fixes back into savannah (assuming everything works well enough to actually get the bugs fixed!).