From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taiju HIGASHI Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add an option to not reduce vocabulary of the Japanese Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 02:01:33 +0900 Message-ID: <878rqce51u.fsf@taiju.info> References: <87r146o2rt.fsf@taiju.info> <8335gme0ml.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6auz1p4.fsf@taiju.info> <83pmjqc89p.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfolwyzj.fsf@taiju.info> <83ee04bz70.fsf@gnu.org> <87h750tzwh.fsf@taiju.info> <83bkv8bl2p.fsf@gnu.org> <87h750e63f.fsf@taiju.info> <835ylgbckg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4519"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 04 19:04:01 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nxXBw-0000zy-Qp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 19:04:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55116 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nxXBv-0008Av-Bw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 13:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nxX9g-0007OQ-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 13:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]:36471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nxX9e-0007do-QR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 13:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id 15so9474760pfy.3 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=taiju-info.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=gAFV8VWzDT6eIIspewig52tGuPjDtJs9mzUT/ULFci0=; b=B3OpmEwNFnLdLDS9jhGYHbDzQBzdp4gJLmf42mv2K98bEg3v69v4x5PV4QBs5kvPww /kyd3iMj/4LU+iMlUJPd0pM0YlSK9qmdxxI+qAf+X1mWyvZOIHogkDwHBjOmmzM0t6aO En0LEMGpw//lluyN0Ut7cEoKCxk/dXVaryE2uAjwEe3bh+1X0+T63xTZEtVlp8Ij8/80 alwEMOcgGstkcrVMaUQdLBHSqvk764p3pkFwJmrM1ObrcN6IOzQGXJRDwX/ZieCeZ5Mo 0k5qUsF9I+MrQF4gYnK4ynvgLrfoeH8vkptIEYtdy9fuLKYCNmBNrJW5RpF/IotvCJGp 4FVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=gAFV8VWzDT6eIIspewig52tGuPjDtJs9mzUT/ULFci0=; b=oUxfKlzvjqpVYIE/Hrb6Ler+Eeh7Tofy8V39SFKuPoACleP7mav/iJnb7eXsl5Q8hs QjGOaMlY07QsC+bLtzH43U2grmpRyAN7J9n18LRCuRLcz0TkqjIRu4ibfU5QHZWhDfDy Lca7WVB51VkVmXqc5C/Ahv75CXcRFLzvmChBMnYNgAqV25AxTrQA0OW5PmQS0KaODfD6 z/hALIvhs1UIJxxDcgUvfZ0f6ZIUpgiM+2LKf7PJuSXli0Iy2ql0EWduusbkJji3SACi By5jLPalJC5ztzJjq2eunsWoS7vaKPmOchltIp02s1qNO7gSk7QBfUTPhtdRRKfTG3nS qNCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+lcIvJGxeXbrk3t4yo7elZnSxXO7PyGoonYwQrVowrR20kRI9 Vgzi9j4s2F8X0YzQwQyTvwm7DfcUMN7ZJNP5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaflKYYH7X4WAXhs0c/4M0MZfzBeiAEuI1DQ4X+cyb1QKgCyz577tfnsHJ/RVc53j8/r7pvA== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6e0a:0:b0:3fc:c510:c154 with SMTP id bd10-20020a656e0a000000b003fcc510c154mr13902393pgb.259.1654362097258; Sat, 04 Jun 2022 10:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Taix ([240b:253:ec40:2400:b7d1:436e:2d61:e925]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x17-20020a056a000bd100b0051be1b4cfb5sm3550086pfu.5.2022.06.04.10.01.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Jun 2022 10:01:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <835ylgbckg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 04 Jun 2022 19:47:27 +0300") Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::435; envelope-from=higashi@taiju.info; helo=mail-pf1-x435.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290668 Archived-At: >> From: Taiju HIGASHI >> Cc: handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 01:39:00 +0900 >> >> >> > So no separate rules should be necessary. >> I see. If that is the case, then the v1 patch may be sufficient. With >> the current rules, the dictionary file has to be deleted beforehand by a >> gen-clean rule or something to regenerate it, but should I add a rule to >> force regeneration even if the dictionary file has already been >> generated? >> >> Sorry for my lack of understanding :’( > > It is I who should be apologizing for my inability to explain myself > clearly. Then, based on the v1 patch, I will wait for Handa-san's review and then I will make the final patch. Is this policy correct? -- Taiju