From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Trey Peacock Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PGTK-related misconceptions Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:45:12 +0000 Message-ID: <878roeekkh.fsf@treypeacock.com> References: <87y202f4dq.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87o80xhor2.fsf@yahoo.com> <877d7lrbta.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87czdszy2r.fsf@akirakyle.com> <875yjkzkuc.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsino7gd.fsf@akirakyle.com> <87lesfuv89.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bktbdkdw.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87o7xaudji.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: Trey Peacock Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22646"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Akira Kyle , Morgan Smith , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 27 15:48:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oGhON-0005f8-AC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:48:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oGhOM-0003vX-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oGhLs-000253-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:45:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch ([185.70.43.17]:27103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oGhLo-00059P-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:45:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=treypeacock.com; s=protonmail3; t=1658929521; x=1659188721; bh=2JRhhn6MZyxpii9eV3I4sP58DGx7sQI432IkipeZGb8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=FlRsjWjojuQ4s8V2079WAstQmT8FjXLvvRl2MLKgo52Q550JJJ1x2/JueR64AIPfJ v5gAstzMtpg7Q7250+JT+ldUW8NSl8uZrNfZMo1UkUotvS1irRgr+JvY8vqEXgm5cD sZFoIVIiiu+be/WrbwOTMTLSW5STUxnCSoCbCpY2Gf2CaxjEz3A/ucRlzdMQI/X/3t wD0Ndg8FxJNgPXoEd/b6gJ+sBAYbI5LP7K5/M1MOlAzxVhDknEknIIgvPvANZjIvwh pEd7VH0kJEBZbqrL8NS+/IW7CgufKwhjZxcDqUv+EOTG1BnYh9QM/hcZTbtSDj08dj LHk9niRMdn66w== In-Reply-To: <87o7xaudji.fsf@yahoo.com> Feedback-ID: 17020329:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.17; envelope-from=gpg@treypeacock.com; helo=mail-4317.proton.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292744 Archived-At: "Po Lu" writes: > Why is Xwayland related in any way? > > And that code is only used when the XKB extension is _NOT_ present on > the X server. Otherwise, the code under update_modmap is used. The > exact analog in Emacs is x_find_modifier_meanings in xterm.c. I was trying to determine why the attached script in python will recognize the virtual mod mask when run under Xwayland but not when run normally.