From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Implementing image support for kitty terminal Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 21:45:24 +0200 Message-ID: <878rmtejl7.fsf@logand.com> References: <87v8pz18wf.fsf@mail.jao.io> <83o7vrgimc.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnafdnee.fsf@logand.com> <835yhzgdyi.fsf@gnu.org> <87k06den1s.fsf@logand.com> <83a679emcs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14260"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jao@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 08 21:55:55 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWNcw-0003X4-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 21:55:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57428 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWNcv-0002UQ-G1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWNSw-0006K6-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:41752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWNSt-0007ni-DM; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:45:32 -0400 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AC3251A1792; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 21:45:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: emacs 28.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <83a679emcs.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295008 Archived-At: On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 21:45, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Of course, if all you want is to display a single image on the screen, Yes, that is enough for me and for the use-cases the author of this thread mentioned. > and don't want to support scrolling of images I think this might be doable. > nor display of images mixed with text, I do not need that. And in case of eww/shr, this has another layouting elisp code which might be more convenient to change. > then these issues pretty much disappear. Yes, that was my point. > But I very much doubt that this will be good enough for our users. It > is definitely much less interesting from my POV, because it basically > means we implement some kludgey and severely restricted semi-solution. It would not be a perfect solution but it might be simple and good enough. Certainly better than nothing at all.