From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60600: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Document manual desktop restore Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 14:30:39 +0100 Message-ID: <878rifsscg.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <875ydkx89b.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83sfgnvpx5.fsf@gnu.org> <87lemfsvbg.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83lemfvm65.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14001"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 60600@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 06 14:31:38 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmop-0003KF-Q1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 14:31:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmoa-0002uz-7H; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 08:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmoJ-0002rf-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 08:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmoH-0006Bh-Uq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 08:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmoH-000367-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 08:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Manuel Giraud Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 13:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60600 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 60600-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60600.167301184411882 (code B ref 60600); Fri, 06 Jan 2023 13:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2023 13:30:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmnz-00035a-Jz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 08:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:46505) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDmnx-00035R-VE for 60600@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 08:30:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=CcwHXg9A6dplxlpV ykff9pTDNtjvCWyP0pHQZdtyrk4=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=DyJrSYLhtOhQhdP1YnEnvvyxRwpxBOUL3sd19Z rEixn0iNEWNR4S/Y9caEre94RRUeSbT42kfFIpN5pfuiBM5nueHUx5GrErjbRoiQyLt6P3 6ZIgBG3xuIPkgTgJA5pzUiFiyDGRtdFsOZlQFkHDBppmBbk7BA9VNeJsDH1vWx8zoHf7vx 8D/UOyeghCr6+s9qK/frAB0rHLm7xSgjBQKricTg+yQliCWbSruoVRMDWdmooc3nle3eWw YSAsZpIifb8X5Q6AG1bfYQaD3tg9Ltu2OQIyTVyv5QVFjUphgX8Vb/m6hQTfUwSAACsvXA Ypyy8a2gGax9R7ZdxbVtJjoQ== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 27252c0f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 6 Jan 2023 14:30:40 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83lemfvm65.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 06 Jan 2023 15:15:46 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:252717 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: [...] > I find the organization of the text in that section not very logical > in general. It begins by describing not-very-important optional > features. It should instead start by describing desktop-save-mode, > since this is the recommended use of this facility, and leave the > manual saving/restoring for later (explaining why one would want to do > it manually). When it describes desktop-save-mode, it should mention > that saving happens also from time to time, not just upon exit, > something that for some reason is described much later in the section. > And the order of describing the various optional features seems to > lack any logic, which at least should be to describe the more > significant/important options (such as desktop-load-locked-desktop, > for example) first. Yes. I had the same feeling when reading this section. It starts talking about desktop-restore-frames before I had grasp what is the purpose of desktop. I'll see if I can come up with something and report here. >> And BTW, shouldn't desktop-revert be the user facing interface here? > > What do you mean? desktop-revert is described in that section (again, > without any hint about when it could be useful). I think I was mistaken desktop-read seems to be the correct interface as documented in desktop-save-mode function. -- Manuel Giraud