From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
To: Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC] ox-icalendar: Unscheduled tasks & repeating tasks
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 09:56:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878retlb89.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wn2d4z3q.fsf@gmail.com>
Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com> writes:
> So the RRULE applies to both DTSTART and DUE, and the repeats continue
> past DUE.
>
> But, another thing to note from the definition of DTSTART [2]:
>
> This property [DTSTART] is REQUIRED in all types of recurring
> calendar components that specify the "RRULE" property.
>
> So technically, a standalone DEADLINE + repeater isn't allowed -- a
> repeating task must always have a start date.
May we then use org-deadline-warning-days/timestamp warntime spec as DTSTART?
VALARM component is not fitting for warning days anyway.
> But still, maybe we should stick to the requirement, and only export
> repeater on SCHEDULED. That would simplify the implementation. The
> downside is that repeating deadlines won't show up in iCalendar, which
> seems undesirable.
Agree. We should better stick to the spec.
>> If we want to leave as many options as possible to the users, we can (1)
>> Implement ICALENAR_DUE property that will set DUE explicitly on export;
>> (2) ICALENDAR_DUE may allow special values that will indicate how to
>> treat Org DEADLINEs - make them into DUE, use Org DEADLINE as a
>> bound for SCHEDULED repeater, or ignore DEADLINE completely.
>
> A couple of these behaviors can already be achieved by customizing
> `org-icalendar-use-deadline' (making DUE or ignoring). For using
> DEADLINE as a bound, we could potentially add another option for that.
Yup. That's what I meant.
>> Is there any reason for this? May we instead export to a single VEVENT
>> with appropriate RDATE list?
>
> I guess if there are multiple timestamps with repeaters, it's easier to
> export these as separate VEVENT, because it's not possible to have
> multiple RRULE in one VEVENT.
>
> But, your suggestion earlier in thread could also solve this: in case of
> different repeaters, we can use RDATE to generate occurrences manually
> sufficiently far into future (with defcustom for "how far").
RDATE is exactly what I had in mind here.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-15 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-26 18:56 [RFC] ox-icalendar: Unscheduled tasks & repeating tasks Jack Kamm
2023-03-27 11:59 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-31 5:55 ` Jack Kamm
2023-03-31 13:07 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-31 15:50 ` Jack Kamm
2023-03-31 17:51 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-31 22:20 ` Jack Kamm
2023-04-01 8:30 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-02 0:47 ` Jack Kamm
2023-04-02 8:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-02 15:34 ` Jack Kamm
2023-04-02 16:32 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-14 16:57 ` Jack Kamm
2023-04-14 18:46 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-15 3:13 ` Jack Kamm
2023-04-15 9:56 ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2023-04-16 17:19 ` Jack Kamm
2023-06-11 15:35 ` [PATCH] " Jack Kamm
2023-06-12 10:36 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-06-17 17:32 ` Jack Kamm
2023-06-18 11:28 ` Ihor Radchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878retlb89.fsf@localhost \
--to=yantar92@posteo.net \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=jackkamm@gmail.com \
--cc=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.