From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65882: 29.1; rcirc doesn't rejoin channels automatically on reconnecting Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 07:50:23 +0000 Message-ID: <878r97ooxs.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87bke85hsb.fsf@gmail.com> <87a5tobby9.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <871qf0atqs.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65882@debbugs.gnu.org, Ryan Yeske , Stefan Kangas , Leo Liu To: Manphiz Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 15 09:51:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3bl-0001ub-Qa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3bP-0000jB-6f; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3bN-0000iu-Ih for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3bL-00037p-R9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3bS-0007bZ-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 07:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65882 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65882-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65882.169476424129205 (code B ref 65882); Fri, 15 Sep 2023 07:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2023 07:50:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3b6-0007az-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:50:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:40243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qh3b2-0007ag-Pa for 65882@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 03:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2549D240029 for <65882@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:50:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1694764224; bh=lkaWDcBFsCfStXPstr5irXRw/ZZvz4iMQHiwLDHvTos=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=DnLCP59LqGfqbHT+cpYUSWeciAjm5zzIV+LHpkEnwoY+qlim/OVFFlRTs3/WDcu7k CgEMS21U2f2NKdFEIRD0NplwLvWvzuFzN97+YC7l/V3t8RVlkczkwW7sNeYaSQOECz k00DqavSC+TuZA8mvsz1q6GpAr9rXA3MgCoYh/EBX0noYG2sJDY2++UhH5xwiK8Vmf wEvi/ehEKo3YWaG+YhZBRugNG3oR+MU2HEGPuikc64a4LZgWu4EU6AJuLnlcm0st+N 8UGEXtNf5+E0xo8p8VPi6R1jDGxgFXh1H/xfucjyJqw0iwwp7YYXP596sKRn8LIwK5 OLypxa1Cg3pVA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rn5vg31XZz9rxD; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:50:23 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <871qf0atqs.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> (manphiz@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 14 Sep 2023 22:30:19 -0700") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:270508 Archived-At: The change makes sense, but I'll want to try it out to make sure we are doing the right thing. Unless I write something here, ping me in a few days. These kinds of auto-reconnect bugs can be annoying to debug in real-life situations. Manphiz writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> severity 65882 + minor >> thanks >> >> Manphiz writes: >> >>> I noticed that you lowered the severity of this bug from "normal" to >>> "wishlist". AIUI rcirc provides a way to automatically join channels >>> upon connecting to a server and currently this is not working as >>> intended, so IMHO it should be considered a bug instead of a feature >>> request (a wishlist). >> >> Thanks, so I bumped it to minor. I hope that makes more sense. >> > > Thanks! > >>> (If you are using severity as a means to manage bug triage priority >>> I'm OK with that.) >> >> My impression is that almost no one pays attention to bug severities, so >> I wouldn't make too much of it. Bug reports that come with a patch, >> like yours did, tend to get more visibility though. >> > > Ah got it. It's my first time filing bug here so not very familiar with > the convention. Looks like tagging patch was a good move :) So this patch would be applied without a copyright assignment, right? >>> Personally, as the patch is sufficiently trivial, I would hope it won't >>> take too much work for a review. But I would understand if dealing with >>> rcirc-user-authenticated is more involved than it looks like and should >>> be handled with care. >> >> I've copied in the rcirc maintainers. Let's see if they have any >> comments first. > > Great! Thanks again!