From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why not include all ELPA packages in an Emacs release? Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 06:25:54 +0000 Message-ID: <878qzrx1cd.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87bk4ql3u5.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <864jagu9ji.fsf@gnu.org> <871q5ktxfh.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , jb@jeremybryant.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Arash Esbati Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 30 08:27:11 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sCZFn-0002HZ-1E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:27:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCZEh-00045J-Ji; Thu, 30 May 2024 02:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCZEg-00044t-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 02:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCZEc-0004st-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 02:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E997C240027 for ; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:25:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1717050356; bh=IOAeZY8jqsxzSK+Mu/trZyxIVx70D8w8vDrx0H2g6YQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=OBXCPMva3RDZ++8exYHaCUYm46XL40QQF+Z9CldEBqjcHtntDaEjfAGRMsWiESlEm EhF3eCel5NCCdkTC0QGESXS3DiTcBjffv4K4xFKNvOAi3WuXmmMCYDf9V5pcICZUIK 2o8nYoXvj9toJA3OX6bhdQoF4fdXDnCWoXTZj8FM2a09LuEDnPSsvDjj7mmYFGlazr az4FN70WDwYmTqG1DH6YDy9Syy1drffTucq61MFAJ3EUyANH8re90FF2hGHU3wd7Qb xq5v3As7ZRtHbDHnKwLLH7e1QHwMUUS1BjtFzNVtUk/RNYfZSUMDy19A2xnBlEz5oP HYv43jC5sar2g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Vqbq71LJJz6tsf; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:25:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Arash Esbati's message of "Thu, 30 May 2024 00:16:03 +0200") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319729 Archived-At: Arash Esbati writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> I am not familiar with cape, > > Cape offers CAPFs, but I think one great featuzre is that you can switch > the CAPF function during completion with something like this in your > init file: > > (use-package cape > :bind (:map corfu-map > ("C-c p d" . cape-dabbrev) > ("C-c p f" . cape-file) > ("C-c p s" . cape-elisp-symbol) > ("C-c p w" . ispell-completion-at-point) > ("C-c p :" . cape-emoji))) I tried it out, and it doesn't seem to work that well without something like corfu or vertico. Generally it seems like an example where "completion" is misinterpreted to mean "selection". >> but IIRC the issue with corfu is that without any further changes, it >> doesn't support non-graphical Emacs, right? > > True, there is corfu-terminal.el for that (which I've never used). > >> "Better", in this case, than `fido-vertical-mode'? > > I admit I've never used `fido-vertical-mode', so I can't offer a serious > comparison, sorry. That's fine. -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine