Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>]

Christopher Dimech wrote:

> All depends on who wants to produce a first release that
> handles two initial mathematical classifications, and which
> helps others extend the library to other additional
> topic classification.

Yes, geometry and arithmetic, right?

Let's start with arithmetic then. We make a plan what we want,
what we already have, obviously we don't do, and we do
the rest.

> The choice would be of someone who would actually get an
> agreed first release out.

What parts of arithmetics would you like to have? You are the
math guy then, if that is the way you like it. You can tell me
what functions and operators are missing - maybe definitions,
actually whatever. Most should be possible to put into code
quite easily, I dare say.

Let's start coding :)

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal