From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: with-current-buffer Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:52:51 -0400 Message-ID: <877jdntumk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126458264 10323 80.91.229.2 (11 Sep 2005 17:04:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 19:04:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEVFG-0001OO-S7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:03:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEVFG-0004QA-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:03:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EEVEc-0004IU-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:03:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EEVET-0004Dj-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEVES-00045Z-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.74] (helo=tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EEV4x-0000IF-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([65.92.243.11]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050911165251.NKIX26550.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BADDD7361; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Emilio Lopes In-Reply-To: (Emilio Lopes's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:00:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42822 Archived-At: > In both cases the insertion is done at the right spot, but in case 1 > point in buffer "FOO" is restored after the code is executed. > Is that intended behavior? > I expected point to be moved permanently in both cases. Which point? Stefan