From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: need option so line-move-to-column ignores fields, plus patch Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:21:58 -0400 Message-ID: <877izmcz3t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <2cd46e7f0608310848l743430e9ia7a1d45e22428083@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0608312339s16a2a101p8c30840bbdeb0d22@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609032143v311b670dra2d2ef679dd936@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609041256q73c0c0d3s7631a964ae9a8367@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609060952m54601787x8c91412af7fbf69f@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609070747o5028d2bewd5a9e79a5afd4a46@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609231629hf2187cbl7e46507ee6070422@mail.gmail.com> <87zmcokjjs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8764fbhbag.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159554005 28938 80.91.229.2 (29 Sep 2006 18:20:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 29 20:20:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMxq-0006m3-BT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:19:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMxp-0003Ls-O8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMxc-0003Lf-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMxa-0003LR-TH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTMxa-0003LO-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:19:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GTN2v-0003Tc-LI; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBD814E410; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri\, 29 Sep 2006 12\:32\:27 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60312 Archived-At: > But if this behavior (i.e., treating non-contiguous fields as > identical for the purpose of line-motion) is really the behavior you > want, and we agree that it will close this bug, I can implement this > even more simply than that, by comparing `field' properties at the > relevant places inside line-move-finish. > > Please give it a try. OK; I've checked in the change.