all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [drew.adams@oracle.com: RE: minibuffer-message-timeout has no effect]
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:21:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877iz96k4k.fsf@furball.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1GWh75-00069d-Vg@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun\, 08 Oct 2006 18\:27\:15 -0400")

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> Would someone please check whether this bug still exists, and ack?

Fixed.

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Subject: RE: minibuffer-message-timeout has no effect
> To: "Emacs-Pretest-Bug" <emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org>
>
> Any news on this bug? I still see the problem in a build from 2006/07/19.
> Thx.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Drew Adams [mailto:drew.adams@oracle.com]
>     Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 1:07 PM
>     To: Emacs-Pretest-Bug
>     Subject: minibuffer-message-timeout has no effect
>
>     FYI -
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+drew.adams=oracle.com@gnu.org
>     [mailto:help-gnu-emacs-bounces+drew.adams=oracle.com@gnu.org]On Behalf
>     Of Stefan Monnier
>     Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:59 PM
>     To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>     Subject: Re: Q on minibuffer-message
>
>     > I tried binding `minibuffer-message-timeout' (to nil and to 0), to no
>     > avail (it seemed to have no effect).
>
>     Looks like a bug.
>
>             Stefan
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Lennart Borgman [mailto:lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se]
>     Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 3:13 AM
>     To: Drew Adams
>     Subject: Re: Q on minibuffer-message
>
>     It is surely a bug. Fsit_for should be using
>     minibuffer-message-timeout,
>     but it just uses 2 for 2 seconds (which you observered).
>
>
>     In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
>      of 2005-06-26 on NONIQPC
>     X server distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
>     configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.3) --cflags
>     -I../../jpeg-6b-3/include -I../../libpng-1.2.8/include
>     -I../../tiff-3.6.1-2/include -I../../xpm-nox-4.2.0/include
>     -I../../zlib-1.2.2/include'
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
> emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
> ----------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> Emacs-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2006-10-10  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-08 22:27 [drew.adams@oracle.com: RE: minibuffer-message-timeout has no effect] Richard Stallman
2006-10-10  1:21 ` Chong Yidong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877iz96k4k.fsf@furball.mit.edu \
    --to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.