From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: isearch multiple buffers Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:46:07 +0900 Message-ID: <877il92pa8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87d4v12tov.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193456808 4509 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2007 03:46:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 27 05:46:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IlcdK-00081v-Hw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:46:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlcdB-0004D4-Tx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:46:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ilccs-0003wc-7b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ilccq-0003ue-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ilccq-0003uR-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:46:16 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp02.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.72]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ilcci-0001l7-Cf; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 203-216-97-240.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.97.240] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1Ilccf-0001iz-UQ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:46:06 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B10082F4B; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:46:07 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri\, 26 Oct 2007 19\:39\:27 -0700") Original-Lines: 15 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81825 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > I still "think that lots of Dired functionality could usefully be ported to > Buffer List." You need not agree. ;-) So why do you think that effort should be spent duplicating what ibuffer has already done? It's not like ibuffer is a different sort of interface from list-buffers, it's essentially the same thing + lots of features. -Miles -- P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false, for reasons of military security.