From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recenter-top-bottom Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:57:03 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <877ikn87iw.fsf@jurta.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194907676 15141 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2007 22:47:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alan.mackenzie_jwa@nxp.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 12 23:47:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iri4U-0006ef-C8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:47:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iri48-0004sw-HX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iri44-0004rD-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iri41-0004q5-4s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iri40-0004py-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.197]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iri3y-0008Ho-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Iri3M-0004ui-TK; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:46:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:34:22 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanner-Signature: ef6c50392af5ec65634338665e82f3c2 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 1768 [Nov 12 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 19 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.8-5.1 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83096 Archived-At: >> If people are very enthusiastic about your second suggestion, >> I will say yes to it. > > I'm neutral. My personal preference (for myself, not for Emacs) is the > second suggestion, and I prefer either to plain `recenter'. But I think it's > unlikely that you will get a consensus for change on `C-l': preferences are > likely to vary, and habit with `recenter' will pull toward the status quo (I > almost said pull toward the center). The status quo that satisfies everyone is to use `C-0 C-l' (just two keystrokes) to put point to the top, and `C-- C-l' (again two keystrokes) to the bottom. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/