From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make-glyph-code incompatibility Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:07:33 +0900 Message-ID: <877igif5qi.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <873ar773m1.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87tzjm95fo.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204672086 3890 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 23:08:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, "Kim F. Storm" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 05 00:08:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWgFL-0007Lu-SK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:08:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgEo-0008Ap-J5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgEi-00088x-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgEh-000881-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWgEh-00087p-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWgEZ-00057y-AR; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:07:43 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-102-071.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.102.71] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1JWgET-0006mo-US; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:07:37 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E8602FF7; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:07:33 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:44:51 +0200") Original-Lines: 17 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91334 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Yes. But you could make the new code use different symbols, and make >> > old symbols be unbound. That would cause error messages early enough. >> >> What symbols? The display table slots? > > No, I meant make-glyph-code and other related functions/variables. > Sorry for being unclear. Code using those should still work, it's code _not_ using them that's the problem... -Miles -- The car has become... an article of dress without which we feel uncertain, unclad, and incomplete. [Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964]