Pure space overflow again

Pure space overflow again

[Sven Joachim]

make -C src versionclean all wrote:

> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1194295 bytes needed)

In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9)
 of 2008-04-24 on debian
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10300000
configured using `configure  '--disable-font-backend''

Anyone else seeing this?

Re: Pure space overflow again

[Andrew W. Nosenko]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
> make -C src versionclean all wrote:
>
>  > emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1194295 bytes needed)
>
>  In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9)
>   of 2008-04-24 on debian
>  Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10300000
>  configured using `configure  '--disable-font-backend''
>
>  Anyone else seeing this?

Yes.

emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1195444 bytes needed)
5448 pure bytes used

Source tree synced from cvs just a minutes ago.

-- 
Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>

Re: Pure space overflow again

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:38:43 +0300, "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>> make -C src versionclean all wrote:
>>
>>  > emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1194295 bytes needed)
>>
>>  In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9)
>>   of 2008-04-24 on debian
>>  Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10300000
>>  configured using `configure  '--disable-font-backend''
>>
>>  Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Yes.
>
> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1195444 bytes needed)
> 5448 pure bytes used
>
> Source tree synced from cvs just a minutes ago.

I can see the same here.  I just added 6 KB to my site-local puresize,
and the build finished as expected :)

Re: Pure space overflow again

[Sven Joachim]

On 2008-04-24 18:35 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

> I can see the same here.  I just added 6 KB to my site-local puresize,
> and the build finished as expected :)

I've increased BASE_PURESIZE to 1200000 instead, anticipating that
somebody will install just that soon anyway.

Re: Pure space overflow again

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:39:21 +0200, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>On 2008-04-24 18:35 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> I can see the same here.  I just added 6 KB to my site-local puresize,
>> and the build finished as expected :)
>
> I've increased BASE_PURESIZE to 1200000 instead, anticipating that
> somebody will install just that soon anyway.

Heh, I suppose that works fine too :-)

Re: Pure space overflow again

[dhruva]

Hi,
I was wondering why I was not seeing the puresize overflow on M$. I
see the makefile on M$ defines PURESIZE=5000000. Is it intentional to
have a different puresize for M$ compared to other platforms?

-dhruva

-- 
Contents reflect my personal views only!

Re: Pure space overflow again

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:49:31 +0530
> From: dhruva <dhruvakm@gmail.com>
> 
> I was wondering why I was not seeing the puresize overflow on M$. I
> see the makefile on M$ defines PURESIZE=5000000.

That's only for bootstrapping.  For normal builds the Windows port
uses the same size as the other platforms (modulo SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA
adjustments, see srs/s/ms-w32.h).