From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#403: 23.0.60; two bugs with internal-border-width Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:19:04 -0400 Message-ID: <877ias3fqv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 403@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218130170 32626 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2008 17:29:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 403@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 19:30:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KR9JL-00074g-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59507 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KR9IQ-0001cK-1W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KR9Gp-0000AU-OL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KR9Go-00008o-77 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44333 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KR9Gn-00008a-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:34789) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KR9Gn-0007m3-Gd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m77HRNmp021649; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:27:23 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m77HP4WU020425; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:25:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 403 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 403-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B403.121812954618821 (code B ref 403); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:25:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 403) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Aug 2008 17:19:06 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m77HJ26O018815 for <403@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:19:04 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7651E57E17C; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:19:05 -0400 (EDT) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:27:27 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19097 Archived-At: > Evalling this form yields 0: > > (let ((f (make-frame '((internal-border-width . 20))))) > (prog1 > (frame-parameter f 'internal-border-width) > (delete-frame f))) > > ... I expected it to yield 20. > > Also, once a frame is displayed, if I modify internal-border-width > (changing it from 0 to 20, say), it can leave some garbage on the > screen, where the new border should be. recenter fixes this. This seems to have been fixed in the meantime. At least, it DTRT on my machine (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9). Do you still see this problem?