From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1488: 23.0.60; dired-pop-to-buffer: use fit-window-to-buffer Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:17:46 +0100 Message-ID: <877i6etrjp.fsf@escher.local.home> References: <87fxl446mr.fsf@escher.local.home> <493939C0.7010507@gmx.at> <87bpvqttvr.fsf@escher.local.home> <493966D2.5050108@gmx.at> Reply-To: Stephen Berman , 1488@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228501853 16451 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2008 18:30:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1488@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 05 19:31:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L8fSq-0007MP-RB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:31:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L8fRf-0003Kt-NO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L8fRc-0003KW-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L8fRY-0003Jl-QN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38690 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L8fRY-0003Je-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:58101) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L8fRY-0007CL-2q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB5IUDG6010881; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:30:13 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mB5IP4ji009249; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:25:04 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: steve@escher.local.home Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1488 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1488-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1488.12285010767885 (code B ref 1488); Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:25:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1488) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Dec 2008 18:17:56 +0000 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id mB5IHqlf007879 for <1488@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:17:54 -0800 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Dec 2008 18:17:46 -0000 Original-Received: from i59F557B6.versanet.de (EHLO escher.local.home) [89.245.87.182] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 05 Dec 2008 19:17:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX184L3MOMeQ4b0PwRRYr0+9ZF+9/3UNiwoNOVxZKzB xph7Jt6gX9Xzr7 Original-Received: by escher.local.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6CC9F7FF56; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:17:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <493966D2.5050108@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:37:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:30:27 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22988 Archived-At: On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:37:22 +0100 martin rudalics wrote: >> You're referring to the parenthetical note below my patch, right? > > Yes. > >> So I >> tested my patched version of dired-pop-to-buffer after applying your >> patch. The result is that dired-pop-to-buffer does not raise an error >> if I shrink the frame to a size too small to show all marked files, >> irrespective of the presence or absence of a header line; in both cases >> I can shrink the frame until only one file can be shown. > > Isn't that what you wanted? I didn't mean to suggest either behavior was better or worse, I just wanted to report the observation. But I agree it certainly is better to have uniform behavior, and no error is fine with me (at least, the particular error message currently used in the no-header-line case seems inappropriate). >> That is, your >> patch makes the behavior of dired-pop-to-buffer (with my patch) >> uniformly like the behavior with a header line without your patch. Is >> that what you intend? > > I don't understand what you mean here. What I wanted to resolve in the > first place was to make `fit-window-to-buffer' not issue an error when > the frame is to small. That's exactly what I meant, and my question was just to be sure this was what you wanted to achieve. > Is there anything else that doesn't work? Not with fit-window-to-buffer, AFAICT. Steve Berman